Hector Spinkel: Round Two

9 04 2012

[This review, first published in 2008, originally closed with the line ' "The Fourteenth Day: A Life of Hector Spinkël" is due to hit cinemas in 2009.'. Alas, the film never 'hit' a single cinema, and is still awaiting release...]

When the news came through, I was lying in the bath, eating a mango. My waterproof radio was set, as always, to Radio Gorky. It was five past nine in the evening and the incomparable Pyetr Blóf – whose voice has always reminded me of Harold Pinter speaking through a snorkel – was on the air. It was not the first of April.

To speak frankly, I’ve never really understood the obsession with Hector Spinkël. So far as I’m concerned, he was no more than another unsuccessful academic trying to make the big time by writing up his failures in a manner some might call comic. They say he was a child prodigy, but there’s precious little evidence of it, save all that tumbles from the mouth of his mother, who has so far outlived her son by twenty years. It seems much more likely that he was simply an odd child, whose natural dreaminess and distinct lack of social skills gave the impression that he must be wildly intelligent. Beyond getting a place at a decent university, he never showed any real evidence of the genius with which he is so often credited. That the very best of his ideas were never written down, as his mother claims, is a rather lazy excuse with which to cast a shroud over the fact that, all things considered, he was the owner of a somewhat average mind. Read the rest of this entry »





A Web is a Web is a Web, or Why I am Not Necessarily as Great a Coward as Many People Think (by Georgy Riecke)

9 04 2012

[To be filed under 'miscellaneous'. This is a piece of writing that very much needs to be seen in context, though I make no apologies for its tone...]

The East Russian wind was never so kind before. She has bitten me oft, with needle-teeth, or punched the cheek, like the farmhand’s fist. She has knocked like a revengeful warrior upon the door of my small summer cottage: constantly, ungraciously, seeking permission to enter the building and continue knocking, like a shuddering hammer, upon my brittle ribs. No, she has never been a kind wind.

This year, however, has seen a change. The wind has not reformed – no! no! let us not go so far as to say that! – but she has gone so far as to let down her guard. Nowadays she resembles a rough-edged blanket: cautiously comforting, but not overly so. She can (on occasion) caress: a much appreciated development, though as yet she has a clumsy touch, like a teenage lover.

These things (and more besides) drift like another wind – the blustery storm of thought – through my mind, as I sit on the shore, looking over the Sea of Japan, mere minutes away from my Vladivostok cottage. Read the rest of this entry »





‘Letters to his Mistress’ Sisters’: George Forthwith-James: A Life

9 04 2012

[A review of Stephen Harragher's biography, by the inestimable Heidi Kohlenberg. This was first published c.2007-8]

It is with regret that I find in the introduction to this biography an attempt by its author to promote the published works of his subject, the late George Forthwith-James. For anyone who has more than a square inch of intelligence will know that the last thing a biography of Forthwith-James needs is a re-appraisal of his novels. In any other case I might argue that the artist’s work ought to be considered in as much light as his life. But not in this one. And not only because Forthwith-James’s novels consistently rank twelve rungs below mediocre. It is more a case of his life being of such monumental interest so as to make consideration of his prose an utterly pointless task. For as his Stephen Harragher will know, there is in the end only really one reason to write – or read – this biography, and that isn’t an admiration for limp Victorian morality tales.

Not that the juxtaposition of the one thing and the other doesn’t still shock. Read the rest of this entry »





Rawls and De Villeon: The Tough Truth

8 04 2012

There’s something mouldy going down in Amsterdam. You don’t need a pair of binoculars to see that intrigue and rumour are stalking the Dutch literary world like a couple of especially long-legged herons with repugnantly ruffled feathers. Eleven months after the death of the famous biographer Thomas Rawls, some papers have come to light proffering new information on one of his largest projects: the 1976 Life of Jerome de Villeon. Why it took nearly a year for someone to remove these four pieces of paper out of the bottom drawer of his desk we shall never know. But we must live with the consequences – managed as it was, I am told, by his one-time assistant Rebecca Fröensbek (whose paper-from-drawers-removal technique is, according to all the best critics, second to none).

That biographers can go through periods of withdrawal following the completion of their work has already been well documented. We have long known about the ‘tepid chicken’ phase, a sad situation which can last from days to months to years, depending on the constitution of the biographer in question. Read the rest of this entry »








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.